Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Financial
  • Centuries-Old Dynasties Reshape Global Capital: How Family Offices Are Redefining the Financial Order

Centuries-Old Dynasties Reshape Global Capital: How Family Offices Are Redefining the Financial Order

Picture

Member for

6 months 3 weeks
Real name
Niamh O’Sullivan
Bio
Niamh O’Sullivan is an Irish editor at The Economy, covering global policy and institutional reform. She studied sociology and European studies at Trinity College Dublin, and brings experience in translating academic and policy content for wider audiences. Her editorial work supports multilingual accessibility and contextual reporting.

Modified

Family wealth driving a new global market order
Asia’s financial hubs expand their family office ecosystems
From preserving wealth to becoming active global investors

The center of gravity in global finance is shifting. Dynastic families that have accumulated vast wealth over generations are moving away from traditional banks and funds to establish their own family offices (FOs) and manage assets directly. This marks more than a simple “transfer of wealth”; it signals a deeper transformation in the way capital is controlled. Markets once dominated by private equity and hedge funds are being reorganized around family offices, while financial hubs such as Singapore and Hong Kong are attracting global wealth with tax incentives. Meanwhile, Europe’s long-established families like the Wallenbergs and Medicis are blending long-term investment with technological innovation, setting new standards for global finance.

Family offices reshape market dynamics through direct investment

According to Deloitte’s Defining the Family Office Landscape report, there were 8,030 family offices worldwide in 2023—up 31 percent from 2019—and the number is projected to reach 10,720 by 2030. Their combined assets under management (AUM) are expected to rise from the current $3.1 trillion to $5.4 trillion by 2030, a 73 percent increase. This trend highlights the growing move among ultra-high-net-worth individuals to strengthen control over their capital through independent management structures, rather than relying on traditional financial institutions such as banks.

This shift is grounded in immense liquidity and operational flexibility. Because family offices do not need to raise external funds, they can deploy billions of dollars in a matter of days and move capital rapidly in response to geopolitical or policy shifts. When combined with leverage and hedging strategies through prime brokerage transactions with major investment banks, their market impact becomes both larger and faster. Many FOs are evolving from passive wealth-preservation vehicles into sophisticated investors expanding into venture capital, private credit, infrastructure, and sustainability sectors—blurring the boundaries of traditional finance.

Their investment approach has also undergone a marked transformation. Family offices, once limited to acting as passive limited partners (LPs) in private equity or hedge funds, now frequently originate deals and co-invest as active general partners (GPs). As “disintermediation” accelerates, direct and co-investment structures are replacing traditional fund-based models. This shift has also prompted a restructuring of performance-based fee systems and customized profit-sharing arrangements, with FOs gaining stronger negotiating power in deal leadership and term-setting.

Their management philosophy differs notably from that of institutional investors. Built on patient, intergenerational capital, FOs prioritize long-term influence and strategic control over quarterly performance, favoring stable growth through increased exposure to private credit, unlisted assets, and infrastructure. Single-family offices (SFOs) leverage confidentiality and agility to act as stealth partners in mega-deals, while multi-family offices (MFOs) achieve scale efficiencies by sharing research and global networks. These capital structures and investment philosophies are reshaping the deal sourcing, valuation, and fee dynamics of the broader private equity and hedge fund ecosystem—fundamentally altering the balance of the financial order.

Hong Kong and Singapore race to attract ultra-wealthy investors

Once concentrated in the U.S. and Europe, the family office ecosystem is expanding rapidly across Asia. The Korea Capital Market Institute reported in July that, among 426,330 individuals worldwide with investable assets exceeding $30 million in 2023, 25.9 percent were based in Asia—a share expected to grow fastest in the coming years. As Western markets mature, family offices are diversifying deal sourcing hubs and co-investment networks, elevating the strategic importance of Asia’s financial centers.

Hong Kong is accelerating inflows through aggressive policy packages. InvestHK announced plans to attract more than 220 additional family offices between 2026 and 2028, submitting tax-reform legislation that expands exemptions for single-family offices and performance-based incentives. This follows the city’s 2021 launch of a dedicated task force providing one-stop support for corporate setup and advisory services, alongside simplified establishment procedures and tax benefits for qualifying entities. By combining market scale, liquidity, and favorable taxation, Hong Kong aims to create an integrated system for trading, financing, and exits optimized for family offices.

Singapore, too, is competing as a family office hub by improving regulatory and tax frameworks. It offers tax exemptions for SFOs and lowers inheritance and dividend taxes to reduce regulatory risks. Recently, major global firms have begun establishing family office operations there as well. Silicon Valley–based Bayshore Global Management, managing about $100 billion, opened its Singapore office to drive tech-focused investments, while Walton Enterprises ($224 billion) and Rockefeller Capital Management ($151 billion) are using multi-family office structures and global networks to expand local deal access.

Family capital outpaces hedge funds

The rise of family offices is redistributing financial power. At deal tables once dominated by private equity and hedge funds, dynastic capital is now asserting greater control through long-term ownership and voting structures. Sweden’s Wallenberg family exemplifies this model, having built intergenerational stakes across Europe’s core industries. The family’s estimated total assets of $500 billion encompass major companies such as ABB, Ericsson, AstraZeneca, Atlas Copco, and SAAB—firms that collectively generate value equivalent to roughly 30 percent of Sweden’s GDP. By maintaining this ownership structure across generations, the Wallenbergs have established one of the world’s most enduring models of long-term capital management.

Italy’s Medici family represents another form of modernized legacy capital. Under Lorenzo Medici, the Medici Family Office has expanded into blockchain and data democratization, venturing beyond traditional finance. In 2023, it invested in the startup Cubera, which allows users to reclaim half of advertising revenue from their data. Guided by its principle of “never selling acquired assets,” the Medici family retains a heavy allocation to real estate and keeps its equity ratio above 70 percent—an approach that supports stable asset growth even in volatile markets.

Such family offices operate with a generational horizon, emphasizing governance quality, social influence, and intergenerational succession over quarterly returns. The Wallenbergs sustain national industrial stability through a foundation–holding–corporate pyramid, while the Medicis fuse traditional wealth with technological innovation to evolve their portfolios. Their approaches stand in stark contrast to the profit-driven structures of conventional private equity and hedge funds, reinforcing a broader market shift from short-term returns toward “sustainable capital stewardship.”

Picture

Member for

6 months 3 weeks
Real name
Niamh O’Sullivan
Bio
Niamh O’Sullivan is an Irish editor at The Economy, covering global policy and institutional reform. She studied sociology and European studies at Trinity College Dublin, and brings experience in translating academic and policy content for wider audiences. Her editorial work supports multilingual accessibility and contextual reporting.